Skip to content
Public transparency surface

Every claim, defensible by primary source.

When we get it wrong, we fix it and tell you why. When the rule is silent, we publish the question.

You run a federal contract. Your books have to defend every dollar against a DCAA audit, a CO determination, or a flow-down review. The reasoning has to trace to the rule. Practice and mandate are different things, and treating them as the same is the fastest way to lose a finding you should have won.

We hold our own content to that standard. Every regulatory claim on this site traces to FAR, DFARS, CAS, the DCAM, or the implementing CFR. When practice diverges from the rule, we flag it. When the rule is silent, we publish the question, our reading, and the question we would file with the agency. On the highest-impact questions, we draft the letter and post the response when it arrives.

Public accounting firms ask the SEC for interpretive guidance in writing and publish the request openly. We borrowed the discipline.

How we got here

We read the rule first.

We run ongoing content integrity audits on every published article. The first full sweep in May 2026 surfaced subsection citations at the wrong letter, common practice framed as DCAA mandate, and penalty thresholds at the wrong multiplier. We corrected each one, posted the diff to the public log, and rewrote the affected articles with primary-source anchors.

For the rest, where practice and the rule diverge or where the rule itself is silent, we built this page. The divergence is public. The rule is named. Practice is labeled as practice. The judgment is yours.

If you find something we got wrong, tell us. Email info@amerifusionconsulting.com or use the Ask Us form.